Dynamics of Post-Election Diplomatic Relations Elections in a country are often a turning point for the dynamics of diplomatic relations. After the election, various changes in foreign policy and diplomatic approaches may occur. In this article, we will explore how post-election political transformations affect diplomatic relations, as well as identify the factors that play an important role in this process. One of the main impacts of elections on diplomatic relations is a change in leadership. New leaders often bring different political agendas, affecting relations with other countries. If elected leaders have a more open global vision, then the possibility of increasing bilateral and multilateral cooperation will be greater. On the other hand, leaders who are more protectionist can push for more aggressive foreign policies and tend to close themselves off. Another influencing factor is the level of public support for foreign policy. If new leaders have strong legitimacy and are supported by the majority of the people, they tend to be more courageous in making strategic decisions within diplomatic authority. On the other hand, if public support is minimal, leaders may hesitate to make big moves in the international arena. Changes in leadership often also bring changes in strategic alliances. New leaders may want to strengthen old partners or forge new relationships with previously ignored countries. For example, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is an example where talks and agreements can be shaken depending on who leads the key countries in the agreement. In a regional context, elections can create uncertainty. Neighboring countries may have misgivings about policy changes and how this could affect regional stability. This often leads to these countries holding diplomatic meetings to clarify positions and create dialogue. Social media also plays an important role in post-election dynamics. With information spreading quickly, public opinion regarding diplomatic relations can be significantly affected. Public reactions to certain diplomatic actions can force governments to adjust their approaches at the international level. There is always a risk that public discontent could dictate foreign policy. Additionally, participation in international organizations after elections often heralds new directions in foreign policy. If the new leader shows greater interest in organizations such as the UN or ASEAN, this could be a signal that the country wants to contribute more to global issues. Post-election communication between countries is also very important. Effective diplomacy involves open and transparent dialogue. Misunderstandings can occur if communication is not clear, and this can damage relationships that have been built over many years. Therefore, keeping communication channels open is crucial to preventing conflict and enhancing cooperation. On the economic front, a change in leadership can have a significant impact on trade relations. Protectionist policies can make other countries think twice before engaging in economic cooperation. Therefore, international trade strategies need to be considered in the context of elections and their impact on the global economy. Elections are indeed the cause of fluctuations in international relations. By paying attention to these facts, we can better understand the complexity of diplomacy in an ever-changing political context. The impact of elections goes far beyond national borders, affecting alliances, policies, and the overall paradigm of international relations.